Stranger Things Season 5 Review: Did the Finale Stick the Landing?

After nearly a decade of Demogorgons, government conspiracies, psychic children, and synth-heavy nostalgia, Stranger Things has finally come to an end. Season 5 arrived with enormous expectations: it had to wrap up a sprawling mythology, resolve long-running character arcs, and deliver an emotionally satisfying conclusion to one of Netflix’s flagship shows.

So the big question is simple: did it work?

This Stranger Things Season 5 review with special guest Rik Carranza takes a clear-eyed look at what the final season gets right, where it stumbles, and whether it ultimately earns its place in the show’s legacy.

A Season Built on Payoff, Not Mystery

Unlike earlier seasons, Stranger Things Season 5 is not interested in slow-burn mystery. There’s no question about what the Upside Down is, who the villain is, or what’s at stake. Vecna is fully established, Hawkins is broken, and the characters are living with the consequences of everything that’s come before.

This makes Season 5 feel more like a direct continuation of Season 4’s finale than a standalone chapter. For some viewers, that’s a strength — the story moves quickly, the tone is urgent, and the stakes are clear. For others, it removes some of the intrigue that made the early seasons so compelling.

The upside: the show knows exactly what it’s doing.
The downside: there’s very little room to breathe.

Character Arcs: Strong Moments, Uneven Focus

One of the highlights of this Stranger Things Season 5 review is the cast’s continued commitment. Even when the writing falters, the performances remain strong across the board.

Eleven continues to carry the emotional core of the show, though her arc feels more about resolution than growth.
Hopper and Joyce finally get their emotional payoff, and for many viewers, Joyce’s role in the climax feels well-earned.
Dustin once again proves to be one of the show’s most consistent and emotionally grounded characters
Steve, Nancy, and Jonathan suffer the most from overcrowding — too many characters, not enough narrative space.

LATEST EPISODE

OH!CAST | Exploring Geek Culture, Fandom and Pop Culture

Brought to you from the wild, wonderful Outer Hebrides, OH!CAST is a geek culture podcast where the Atlantic winds meet the winds of change in fandom, gaming, and all things nerdy.Tune in for insights, laughs, and plenty of “oh!” moments.

In this episode of OH!CAST, the hosts welcome veteran game artist Simon Butler, whose career spans more than four decades and hundreds of games—from the earliest 8-bit era to modern indie development. (Content advisory: this episode contains strong language and frank discussion throughout.)

Simon shares the remarkable story of how he accidentally fell into the games industry in the early 1980s, back when the role of a “game artist” barely existed and developers were inventing the craft as they went along. From drawing sprites on graph paper to pushing pixels across multiple platforms, he recounts what it was really like working during the formative years of the industry.

The conversation explores Simon’s time with studios such as Ocean Software, the realities of developing movie tie-ins, and the chaotic creativity of early game development. He talks about working on titles connected to classic franchises, contributing graphics to Worms, and the infamous Highlander adaptation—while offering candid reflections on what worked, what didn’t, and why some games became legends for the wrong reasons.

Along the way, Simon shares stories about tight deadlines, overnight crunch sessions, and the culture of the 8-bit development scene—plus his unfiltered thoughts on retro nostalgia, the AAA industry, and why indie developers today are closer to the original spirit of game creation.

It’s a funny, honest, and occasionally brutal look behind the curtain at how classic games were really made—and how the myth of the “golden age” compares to the reality.